>>4382914>>there is nothing wrong with cameras being lower tech than phonesThe tech is on your desktop. ILC buyers want flexible, neutral RAWs ooc.
>Everyone without a press contract is seeing a slow death via a shrinking market.Which has nothing to do with computation photography and everything to do with:
- The death of the P&S to SLR pipeline.
- People being completely satisfied with DSLRs and lenses from the last decade.
>Because they are awful at it. Phones are not.Because I can't possibly tweak all the settings I want to tweak on the back of a camera screen judging by a tiny camera LCD.
>RGBW is significantly betteer. That's cool, can you post some photos to show us how much better it is?
>Non asian businesses are selling 12k RGBW sensors with 16 stops of DRShow me on a test which is equivalent to PtP or DxO. The methodology and thresholds matter. Target view size also matters. Let me guess, the BlackMagic is claiming 16 stops off a step wedge test intended for 4k monitor viewing, right?
>You are coping with 14 stop 6k-9k bayer sensors in FF.I'm not coping with anything. I stopped lusting after more at 50mp FF, and DR has not been an issue despite the "low" ranking of 12.5. Sun in frame landscapes are the only possible situation left where I might need more and have to blend two frames, but I'm not even really running into that.
>Japanese innovation is nonexistent and they have not improved image capture since 2013Higher res, more DR, better high ISO, AI subject tracking, blistering fps, and oh yeah, you get a 4k cinema camera at the same time. What in the holy fuck are you blathering about?
>and the 15 pro max beat micro four thirdsShow us. Maybe it has, Idk because I don't shoot either. But you need some evidence for your claims.
>Rods are used heavily in daylight image processing.picrel