>>2896789>Listen bud, FF or ASP-C lenses lose to MFT either on compactness and weight because with native or smaller lenses, MFT can always go below, or they lose in lens selection, because MFT can adapt anything. Even old CCTV lenses.Look at this idiot. With Mfturds you have to use a fucking ADAPTER to make those FF and APS-C lenses work. Don't you know that ADAPTERS increases the weight and size of your camera because it goes between the lens and the body.
What a dimwit.
>And there we have the pixel-pinchers>call someone as pixel-pincher because his Meme4/3 has shit quality and grain at iso 800>unless you got good stabilization. And bigger sensors are also harder to stabilizeI'm talking about moving subjects faggot. A moving person cannot be shot without motion blur at 1/10 of a
second.So much for shooting Meme4/3 on street when most subjects are moving.
>Someone doesn't know shit. Also, what good is that argument if you make the argument that DSLRs have been used in Hollywood production?It means they are used by big production houses because they know that FF and APS-C cameras deliver high quality video for their films.
>You can get stellar MFT performers weighing less than 150g with hood and filter.The smallest mfturds the GM5 weighs 275 grams. Did you get your data up in your anus?
>Some people are just okay with trading a few lux in lightperfomance and a few megapixels for better niche usability.What niche? Even compacts now have better sensor and image quality than a shitty Mfturds. They are even smaller. So I know you will say "what about interchangeable APS-Cs? hurr durr" Well lookup Fuji X-M1 which is of the same size as an olympus pen and also cheaper.