>>2895878you would get this isn't 'baby first photo' because of F4 and shutter speed in a manual exposure, and the photo isn't crushed at the blacks and shadows, no information was lost.
>>2895874Ok, if this wasn't sarcastic, you got what I tried to do
>>2896018It's dark but not black on my phone... and no, my D600 is after that problem, never had any issue
>>2896230actually, it's 2 stops
It was a quick shot, and I had forgot to change the ISO when grabbed my camera, I liked the way it was underexposed, and thought it was a nice capture.
that's better?
