>>3891552Pic related, how come "ideal" and real CMOS sensors continually come out as dropping one stop of DR per stop of iso raised.
And how come I can post proof that I'm right, but you can't? Surely if you were right than you'd have some measured data to back it up?
>>3891507Let's be real, moopco still decides what threads are active. You're a pawn in his games.
>>3891554I am already a locally successful fine art photographer, Pro tip, if you want to make bank sell at Sunday markets and the like, to make even more buy a load of frames in bulk and triple the price. Normies love that shit, £1000 a day profit ez. Sell photos of tourist shit, done with the tiniest bit of artistic flair, high contrast b&w still suckers people in. Exhibitions are a shit way to make money but a great way to feel like a god.
