>>4197913You know what's also funny about him? He keeps namedropping Deakins and claiming his work is inspired by him. But the resemblance it bore was to John Deakin the photographer, not Roger Deakins the cinematographer. Pic related. B&W boudoir just like scheisschizo's.
He says "inspired by XYZ" but what he really means is imitating XYZ. There's a saying, "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery" but it's just half of Oscar Wilde's quote. The second half is "that mediocrity can pay to greatness". And unoriginal mediocrity is all an imitator who doesn't really know what he's doing can offer. He's content with his mockery what the ones he worships do, like cargo cult tribes were content with their straw planes. But they just won't take off, and they have no clue why. This guy congratulates himself on getting "inspired" by celebs and using the same gear as the "pros" use, thinking it makes his stuff good. He went as far as calling his material the "same style" as that other anon who was an actual pro. Absolute fraud.
