>>2655764>>2655759And so we refer to the 100% crops to demonstrate your retardation.
Pic related are crops of the lightest and darkest sections of that frame, with vaguely pictorial amounts of contrast applied to both.
The film has a massive dynamic range, "contrast" is a decision you make in post.
I could process that shot flatter, but that would look like shit.
I though I'd left in enough clean detail in the highlights and shadows to make my point, but evidently not...