>>4203760>with regards to fuji iso settings, is it really cheating or is itRegardless, it's a completely irrelevant for real world shooting. You don't have to meter any differently, and pictures look normally exposed in a typical raw processor without any further adjustment. Picrel is the same exposure settings across multiple brands, all with the same default/no adjustment in C1, Fuji lands in the middle in terms of "brightness". The only impact it actually has is for arguing online.
>>4203778Fuji's fine, gets a lot of haters though. If it's good enough for some pros to use, should be fine for an beginner like you. Maybe not the best in terms of min/max price/perf, but if it does everything you want it to, and you enjoy it, that's all that really matters.
>>4203779Even just for stills, I've found the X-T5 well worth it over an X-T4, and its definitely a big step up from an X-T3.
