>>3870745>Emiv is £600The top seller was the iii, dumbass
>£60 50mm£50* I gave you the name dude, just tap it into google, they currently on eBay for £45 brand new with delivery.
>MirrorlessAre you literate, I never specified mirrorless, it's EF mount.
>I can find a 50mm 3.6 and 50mm 3.4 equivalent lens for £215 or £144Sony 50mm 1.8 - £150
Nikon F 50mm 1.8 - £170
Canon EF 50mm 1.8 - £70
Canon RF 50mm 1.8 - £210
Turns out that even OEM brand lenses that are 4 times faster are more affordable than mft, great job pal.
>>3870781>Non sequitur after being triggered by me correcting you wrt resolutionLol
>Pseudo science about informationGot a citation for that fella?
>What matters is photosite sizeOh really, pic related. Can you explain why the 12mp and 60mp full frame shots are near identical, and the 10mp and 20mp mft shots are near identical? Protip, it's because pixel pitch is meaningless.
>Mft is best for street>Street is the lowest form of photographyYou did this to yourself anon
>People use tri-x because of characterand you use sooc jpegs
>If you match dof noise is the samePresuming I've gone up 2 stops on aperture and up 2 stops on iso to compensate
>Shutter speedWhy would I go for ANOTHER 2 stops on top through slowing my SS? My point was that I have a lot more flexibility, 2 whole stops, for you to have equal noise you'd need to increase your shutter speed by a multiple of 4 of mine, lol!
>Who are you quotingYou, you dunce, you literally said "FoV and DoF are subjective at best"
>F number is subjectiveNo, it's not subjective, it's basic maths.
>Cad designed lenses in the 40'sLmfao, the first computers that could do specific tasks started in the 40's, the first was used to calculate ballistics and had over 17'000 vacuum tubes, it was the size of a tennis court. When wiki says "jgb was the first to use a computer to help design optics (citation needed)" they're not talking about cad sweetie, they're talking about basic calculations.
