>>2613162>Literally no benefit? Lmao. Are you implying you nail exposure 100% of the time on your SLR?By understanding my meter, and letting the camera do its job, yeah, I nail exposure every time. Auto ISO limited to 3200, and shutter priority set to 1/160, spot metering on the singer's face, EV comp to +2/3
Getting a correct exposure is the most basic aspect of photography. Are you implying that that's difficult for you?
>and auto iso results in inconsistent workIn what way? On an ISO-less sensor like yours, pushing to ISO 3200 from ISO 200 is exactly the same as shooting at 3200 in the first place, so, whether you're letting your camera do the work for you, or spending an hour doing it all yourself at home (and delivering your photos way after me) you're getting the same results. So why not just let the camera do its job?
>BTW your understanding of exposure is still shit if you think the same image is produced. 