>>4077641>despite being on sensors that all came from the same factory made on the same machinery.what does this have to do anything? if the noise reduction applies to raw why is it not fair to compare them? i dont understand
>different lenses that are both reviewed as being excellend across the frame.if we're being this pixel peeping, even 2 excellent lenses can look a bit different
https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=1458&Camera=1210&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=1216&CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0i see as much a difference in softness just between the lenses as i do based on the iso sample
>Then compare the GFX to the X1D, pretty much identical, and better than the best FF resolution.the 100mp, sure, but resolution is much greater
how come these high res FF models show more detail than the 50mp gfx?
i thought you said resolution was limited by the sensor size?
