OP here and what this anon posted
>>3167266is pretty much the clarity i would get from canon kit lens. Not razor sharp, but at least corners wouldn't be fucked
>>3167242>I don't even use the a6k but sample shots from flickr looks great.opinion discarded
look closely at some of the flickr shots, they may be good photos but the corners are just fucked.
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/39792237@N02/11376036944/sizes/o/> https://www.flickr.com/photos/23671122@N06/9432245125/sizes/o/https://www.flickr.com/photos/78743072@N04/14583507266/sizes/o/I used to think good copy/bad copy was just a meme excuse for poor technique, until I picked up the a6000 16-50 kit lens. I've been using a cheapo 80$ neewer 35mm lens with better results.
