>>3865672Jesus, chill out. Those examples are strawmen, I am not saying that you need to be shooting CONSTANTLY in order to discuss photography, but you should be shooting enough to include a photo that is good enough in your own eyes along with each post. Why do you think the catalog is filled with idiotic irrelevant questions like pic related?
>>3865677Post one of your own photos demonstrating your "intent and direction" and I'll continue replying to you