>>3760040Very comfy thread, OP
>>3760047>>3760069Could you post the RAWs for these two photos? I'm curious to know how much underexposure there was straight-out-of-camera because these look great. I'm interested in knowing how much of the final exposure is PS/LR exposure latitude magic versus the portable light you mentioned in one of your posts.
>>3760063>>3760064I don't like that pole. It's ugly and doesn't add to the composition or subject at all. I think both of these photos would look better with a tighter crop and with the pole clone stamped out. I started doing it on the left in pic related to give you an idea, but needs 9000 more hours in PS on the outer fringe of the tree.
