>>3445241At the moment I just want to replace the canon 1300D with a better one for dim forest lighting. Specwise the nikon D3500 looks to be OK for it. Though I can't really be sure about that, since I'm not versed on ISO range and light sensitivity when it comes to sensors. More range = less noise in my mind. Most likely retarded, but someone will correct me if that's the case.
I do plan on getting me one of the more expensive snappers at some point. I'm a sucker for resolution. The D800 looks ideal, but it's an older model. I'd probably go with the latest equivalent. But that's for another time.
>>3445251>>3445252Photography's a waste of time and money in general. But I like to stare at captured pixels. Them's the breaks.
https://www.mediafire.com/view/k0ofx1aitr6hdah/GG4B7070.CR2/file 