>>3753151>You must be really desperate to compare cameras at 25600 iso... You're coping. Fact is, the Sony still looks somewhat acceptable at that level while the Panasonic is a mess. It has a sensorlet.
That video you posted is pretty much noise-free but the price is aperture. They were working with f/1.4 lenses and such. It forces you to get super fast lenses to compensate. And it didn't get very good contrast.
>Sony is at 8bit. That's killing low light filmic capabilities in an instant.Did you see the footage I posted? It's pretty nice outside of the dark forest shot.
8 bit kills low light if you're doing log but maybe other profiles can use it with no issues.
>You compare a7iii and gh5s and bmpc4k, and you end up with bmpc4k in the lead with a7iii in the last place.BMPCC4K is awful, the GH5S gives a more aesthetically pleasing output. The BM may look better on paper but the footage I've seen looks sterile.
>>3753162I don't know, do you plan to do video or something? I'd get a DSLR instead if not.
