>>4398621>Optics areOptics certainly affects the amount of visible detail, but how far you can actually crop in is going to be resolution dependent. Having better optics doesn't really mean you can crop more, just that the detail present when cropping is hire (but that's also true of resolution).
> The larger photosites of a 24mp ff will show fewer lens aberrationsThis is just an assumption though. You are generally correct, but there are lenses with good aberration control and poor aberration control, regardless of format.
>unless you go full retard and buy $1000 primes for aps-cSo you agree with me then.
>So you can actually crop FF moreSometimes yes, sometimes no.
>sharper effect is also 3d popAlso mostly lens dependent, but here's an actual photo example (since we are a photo board).
If you just mean most FF lenses can resolve more detail than most aps-c lenses, I agree with you.
>>4398622Nope, maybe in your head.
