>>4129869>maybe a portrait lens on the sideThere's no need for a (traditional tele) portrait lens for OP's "photos of people doing interesting things in interesting places". The one 35mm lens is perfect for that.
But maybe consider the 24 or 40 G lenses instead of a 35, where you have to choose between the lacklustre f1.8 and the f1.2 GM which costs a fortune and completely defeats the purpose of a compact camera.
I love the concept of a compact full frame camera, but they just don't have enough lenses that makes any sense for it. If they released a 35 and 50mm G lens and a high res compact body it would be the prefect system for me.
