>>3448727>Actually I have used a 5Dsr when it first came out, and it was a real pain in my fucking ass to edit the raw files. Noise as fuck at the base ISO I've made ISO 1600 and 3200 16x20 prints that don't have a hint of noise. I've got base ISO shots that look like they would still hold up well at 72" (120ppi) for something like a store window display. The limit at base ISO is ppi and NOT any noise.
>and the banding was really annoying when you lift the shadows.You're a liar and have never touched one of these cameras.
Banding is simply not an issue when you push shadows. Noise is what limits you. If you go past where you normally would based on noise you might find some banding but that's not the limiting factor.
The 5Ds is about 1 stop behind the Sony A7r III in shadow latitude as you can see from the attached pic. With some NR work you can push 5 stops. On a Sony you would be able to push 6 with the same NR work.
>glad they work out and made those cameras usable. but when it first came out, it was utterly garbage.Canon didn't change anything significant from the day they were released. The firmware updates were minor. They certainly didn't change the sensor itself.
The only significant change was that Adobe's initial profiles for ACR and LR were shit so they released an updated set. But they were shit because they crushed blacks which, if anything, would have hidden the noise you're claiming existed. For the record: I use and highly recommend the Huelight profiles for the 5Ds.
>now I can only wait for the same issues they had when they though about releasing their high mp count cameras.You've never touched a high MP camera so stop posing.
>Go Sony already.Stop shilling already.
