>>4310377Not from there, just visited, but good spotting!
>>4310364>expensiveIt was ever thus, it all went wrong when digi became cheap.
>>4310379Gold 200, it's right there in the filename
>>4310381Both of the native Z macros are excellent optically, but for scanning the 105mm is easier because
>more working distance>easier to align film parallel to sensor>less vignette>less visible sensor dust>less visible backlight/diffusion panel dust>easier to evenly illuminate the background with a narrower FOV>less diffraction softening at small aperturesWhich is all to say that a great result can be had with either, but will be easier to achieve with the 105mm
