>>3904107>>he thinks the sensor is the only source of noiseI think you've been BTFO as to your claim that a T3i is too noisy at base ISO to make good photographs, so now you're going to move goal posts and nitpick technical differences that are invisible even in larger prints.
>Better cameras utilizing the same sensor out perform cheaper models that use the same exact sensor, because they've got improved electronics with lower noise, PtP measurements say otherwise in this case (pic related).
>You can check out RAWs from better cameras here including the 5Ds you mentioned.Yes, there are better cameras than the 7D or T3i. That in no way supports your ridiculous claim that a photographer can't take good photographs with a T3i.
>The 5Ds is as clean as the T3i at 400 ISO and the D850 rivals it at up to 800 ISO.You can't see the noise from ANY of these cameras in 16x20 prints from RAWs at ISO 800. I can personally testify to that as I own two of them and have a close friend with the third (he has owned the D800E, D810, and D850). And we both make big prints.
>Neither is a 100 ISO shot from a T3i, but neither are free from noise and you get a visible benefits from upgrading.You get visible benefits if you're making very large prints, cropping heavily, or shooting even higher ISOs. That's simply not the same as "hurr durr T3i can't make a good photograph."
cont.
