Lol niggas what's happening in this thread. Can't leave you alone for a second can I
>>3482461They're both a product shoot and about my hand fetish. I also took proper products without model but 1) I find working with people more fun than just plain product and I'd rather share the former 2) without human figure it's hard to understand the scale of the necklaces, I showed pic related to some friends and they thought it was waaaay smaller 3) I probably have a hand fetish. They look nice and it's a way to show how the necklaces distort things.
>>3482480There's no way I'm not keeping shooting. Thanks for the encouragement anyway
>>3482483>>3482487Dunno about winter but summer is round the corner
>>3482485No, please don't. It's my thread. They can make their own thread somewhere else.
>>3482499Where did I tell anything like that? Nigga u high? Cuz u deffo seein thangs lmao
>>3482500>>3482502>>3482505>>3482526>>3482692>>3482833(you)
>>3482519Funny thing is, I already cloned out some dust and loose hair. Was in a rush to scan and didn't clean properly. For the hair I forgot to bring a brush. Lessons learned, hopefully.
>>3482522Have you forgot an /\M8U5H somewhere, anon? Anyway, no. Alex is a master of natural light, he'd probably shoot this in the nature. Besides he wouldn't do basic bitch mistakes like too hot lights on last photo.
>>3482627>>3482628Lol. It could be. The handbook would actually be a good idea. But Bruno Munari already did that. Google "Speak Italian: The Fine Art of the Gesture"
>>3482714Thanks for understanding it's a product shot, it wasn't all a failure then. To be honest I wanted it to be about the hands as much as about the product. As I said, I find them a more interesting photo, even if it's worse for their intended goal.
>>3482831>>3482836>whyTo show a series of necklaces, and to appease my hands fetish. Everybody else got it and the fact you didn't should be a hint you need to get better at looking.
