>>4243540R6 and Z6ii are virtually the same. And he had to appeal to "muh equivalence" and drop m43 ISO 2 stops to try and compete. And before your ask, the R6ii is virtually the same as well.
>>4243537>>How the fuck are you going to "equate the aperture" with a 35 f/1.4 or a 50 f/1.2?>I am not, such lenses do not exist for m43 So sensor size does matter, doesn't it?
>just like an 200-800mm zoom does not exist for FF.No, but if you're shooting high resolution FF you can crop to the m43 center of a 100-400 for similar reach. 20mp m43 still has more pixels on target, but the end result is pretty close.
>The same way FF cannot match the video capabilities of m43 for under $5000.I could argue that m43 cannot match the video capabilities of FF at all. Your argument is based on some stupid codec you can get with an external recorder. Mine is based on low light capability that m43 simply can't match.
>>>4243534>So the only thing you shoot is photos at ISO 25600?So the only reply you have is an exaggerated straw man?
