>>3963015>>3963017Meaning "your" reality is not the entirety of reality. If you weren't taking such a hardline stance I wouldn't be engaging with you so much in order to get you to budge. But the fact that you refuse to budge and remain elitist tells me that you have some monolithic structure of what art "should" and "should not" be, and the implication that your interpretation is the only one fir the pieces presented in this thread show me that you are closed to subjective reality, which is very un-artistic and in fact very autistic. No small wonder you're a gearfag! The specs and checklist of compositional elements will tell you that a photo is good or not, not your subjective analysis nor the identification that a person might make with a given piece of work. Truly you are nothing but objective, not limited. I am the limited one, and I am entirely limited as compared to your endless knowledge and wisdom of the topic at hand
Clearly, I'm bullshitting you with that last bit. I cannot reason with a person so rigid, so I've taken to talking circles around you to annoy you and provoke a response. Analyze that. And don't forget to post more photos. No feeling allowed, though
