>>3829565wow im famous
>>3829577you don't need a darkroom to develop film, you just need a dark space to load film (windowless room or dark bag). you can get everything you need off freestylephoto for <$100 to get started
>>3829615never heard this...but i also don't watch hipster film photographer yootoobers
>>3829774if it's on the negatives:
1) the film wasn't tightly wound after you finished shooting and light seeped in
2) if expired + room stored it may be due to age
if it's not on the negatives:
1) it's light seeping through the edge of the film and film holder while you're scanning
