>>4472438>otherwise he's turned into an n/p/c, indistinguishable from all the other gearfags here that are exactly like him.It's funny
Every digislug gearfag is EXACTLY the same person. Other than the generic pro-brand A anti-brand B opinions being switched around they are all identical.
Same personality.
Same interests.
Same hangups.
Same kind of "photography" (super boring shit, ie: every single one takes a photo of a foggy tree)
Everyone likes and hates things for the exact same reasons as 100 other people.
None of them can agree.
None of them make any sense and sound like pretentious shitheads with no talent to someone who is not a gearfag.
All of them are in same places (/p/, mu-43, fredmiranda, youtube)
Digital "photography" is a "hobby" for NPCs.
>>4472398>the only happy people here shoot film. everyone else is fucking miserable. digital photography makes you unhappy the longer you do it unless you refuse to see no one gives a shit.Most correct sentences ever written on this bitch of a board but if I might add
>[high end] digital photography makes you unhappy...Digital photos are worth nothing so a digital camera of negligible value is fine.
A medium format sized and priced FF digital, even a nikon Z7 with a 26mm pancake, for all its dynamic ranges and ISOs and pixels, takes photos that are just as worthless as the ones from an iphone
A fake film camera, like a $10,000 leica or $2000 fujifilm, despite its looks, still takes photos that are just as worthless as the ones from an iphone
Just avoid micro four thirds so they don't look exactly like an iphone. APS-C DSLRs and cheap aps-c sony mirrorless are everywhere. D200, K10D, etc - $100 cameras.
