>>2717979>Pentax 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 DA WRCan't comment. But I do own the:
SMC Pentax-F 35-135mm f3.5-4.5
which is good, but I rarely find myself wanting to use any lens that isnt f/2.8 these days.. also my version is noisy (screw drive AF), and the concept of calling it a macro is not entirely convincing.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/SMC-Pentax-DA-18-135mm-F3.5-5.6-ED-AL-IF-DC-WR.html
http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/SMC-Pentax-F-35-135mm-F3.5-3.5-Macro-Zoom-Lens.html>Pentax 100mm f/2.8 D FA WR macroI have the
SMC Pentax-F 1:2.8 100mm macro
It's very good. Sharp and quick to focus, has focus limiter to speed up 1m+ shooting focus seek times, and is easily useful at f/2.8
I haven't used mine a lot, but only becasue I made the mistake of buying another nice lens ( SMC Pentax FA 50mm F2.8 MACRO ) shortly after the 100mm.
I would categorise both of those lenses as keepers though, along with the others i posted about previously.
..even though I don't use the 50mm much now, and the 100mm even less, they are both outstanding macros that can also be put to general walkaround use.
>Pentax 55-300mm f/4-5.8 DA HD WR As said: It's a good lens for what it is and the price.
