>>3655260>i wasn't the one calling you out, but i'd assue it's the 'unique image id' or the filenames that are rustling him.Dang, now we'll probably never know for sure, since I doubt he'll respond now that I've posted proof. Oh well.
If you're curious, the reason my exif here has less data than yours is because I set up a special /p/ export script in Lightroom to strip the majority of the exif fields out so I could still have things like shutter/aperture/iso/camera that people here might be curious about without having to worry about the fact that some of my cameras also stick my full legal name in there. Not that it provides *that* much security since a lot of the people here can dox me based on writing style alone from back when I was posting with a tripcode, but it at least gives them a small extra hoop to jump through.
(Bonus low res thumbnail titties in the screenshot.)
