>>4077654>so seeing this in RAW files is bad.yes! which is why it is important to compare them. because again, different cameras are different, if one has more baked in NR, that makes comparisons even more important does it not?
>but stopped downi linked just the 50 f1.8 and 85 1.8 which were on the Z6 and Z6II you talked about, even at the shot f5.6, i see a clear difference in sharpness
>again, these high iso images are meaningless for noise comparison due to varying amounts of noise reductionif the noise reduction is unavoidable, why can't we compare them? you're literally saying we can't compare pictures from different cameras because the are processed internally differently
>I'd guess that's down to fuji using old optical designs for filmso you now agree that lenses are different and can contribute to the differences seen? you're just in denial that resolution matters too
>If we compare the centre of the image, the larger sensor clearly takes the lead. pic related.or maybe it's a combination of things more than just sensor size? how come A1 and Z7II look better?
> If you want to know the "real" amount of noise then just look at dynamic range charts.ah, so charts are a better indicator of real world performance than actual pictures, got it!
