>>3368135Your photos aren't vomit-inducing—they're just amateur and confusingly boring! But hey, there could be something there—an idea or novel perspective—that just needs more developing (no pun intended), and with time maybe you can develop it. If you legitimately like photography, then please don't get discouraged. The only medicine to mediocrity is perseverance.
I should probably also add for context that for me photography is a means to an end—artistically speaking. I'm probably alone here when I say this, but I don't see photos I've taken as final works of art, just key ingredients for later pieces that combine them with other mediums (paint, ink, etc.) so as to *attempt* to say or express something new. As a craft, photography is good: there's a demand for it in the world. But personally, I see it as a single step in a longer process of presenting a hopefully actualized idea. The only question you have to ask yourself is: why am I taking pictures?
Anyway, here's another decent recent pic of mine from a series of double/long exposure experimentation that treats the moon as ink and the camera as paintbrush (the abstract face is moonlight)
