>>3256444Thanks for the advice, I'll give that a try next time. The reason I was thinking something was wrong is that all but one or two shots on that roll have that very grey underexposed look; most much worse than that one I posted. For comparison here's some Acros 100 I shot a while back with the same camera and all the shots on that roll look more or less correctly exposed. Is this just a property of tri-x? I thought tri-x was supposed to have more latitude than something like Acros
