>>4295119They are really not good cameras, but they have a feature that is invaluable to certain kinds of people - feminine people.
Fujifilm cameras are narrow toed, high heeled shoes or tight pants with shallow pockets. They are inconvenient and not very useful but feminine leaning individuals irrationally adore them even if they're an asian ripoff of an italian designed original (alibaba is chic!)
>inb4 a dying /p/ cope - how can you be an artist if you don't care about aestheticsThere are masculine aesthetics and there are feminine aesthetics. Fujifilm leans hard into pairing with feminine aesthetics and lifestyle decisions.
It should work out for them, because that's a little over 50% of people, and way more than 50% of "photographers" (whether or not you'd call them photographers based on your own artistic standards...)
>>4295366They essentially are. They run a business. Canon's #1 spot is entirely because they went to pro-friendly wholly electronic lenses in the 90s so every other pro, with a pro attitude...
>i will eat any cost now to get every shot later (so i dont get outdone or disappoint). more fps! more autofocus! culling? i charge extra....is now so heavily invested in Canon they can not leave while exercising good business sense even if canon is objectively overpriced overweight overkill dogshit for everyone who does not shoot events for a living.
