>>3538067>>3538070>Also as much as you try with the M43, you will never get the same Bokeh you can get out of a FF.>That's about as good as a F2.8 lens on FF.>You can't get the same bokeh you would get with a FF camera + f1.4 lens.Who fucking cares, bokehwhoring is a fad for talentless hacks. I never once needed more bokeh than f/2.8 when I shot FF professionally, ever. That's over 160+ portraiture gigs that never once where I required or even desired more bokeh than MFT can provide.
Bokeh is a fucking meme, and a stale one at that.
>>3538085As I understand it, the Art series is their premium line, so supposedly better optics vs. the DC, but you'll have to look into it more, I only own the 19mm 2.8 A and it's a great lens for MFT drone work.
>>3538095It's hilarious how pathetic these FF (specifically Sony) shills are, they have to outright lie their asses off to make themselves feel better. The 42.5 Nocticron is by no means soft, but if you want the absolute in sharpness, there is also the Olympus 45mm f/1.2 that is not only one of the sharpest lenses available, but also has Olympus' "feathered bokeh" rendering which is beautiful. Pic related.
>>3538135>these mft threads are the equivalent of teenagers insisting their riced-up Hyundais are just as good as a Ferrari because they can both reach the speed limitThat's a fucking retarded analogy, but if the "speed limit" is getting paid by clients, then yeah dumbass, what kind of fucking retard would pick up an Uber fare in a Ferrari?
Motherfucker, you can't even afford a Ferrari, even in this analogy. Your dumbass doesn't even shoot photos for a living.
