>>3401557>canon lol yesIn japan, sure
In the usa, a much larger market,both the a6000 and a7iii outsell the m50
>canon took a third of all sales when the eosr was releasedNo,they took just over 20% of the ff milc market, in japan, where canon sells much better
https://www.diyphotography.net/canons-eos-r-has-already-taken-22-of-the-japanese-full-frame-mirrorless-market/>you talk down to other anons for being wrongLmfao, we really have hit at the heart of how disingenuous you are, expecting me to praise and support you even when you're wrong? Nah senpai,I'm not your mom.Grow up
>not randomizedYes it was,lol,you would look less stupid if you at least watched the video.
>one test by a youtuberOf comparing how the sensors rendered colour compared to the macbeth chart and measuring the delta-e variance, it's an objective test that can be repeated by anyone.Fanboying would have zero effect on the outcome
>the problem was acknowledged by sonyAnd then fixed...
if the fixed version and a version without the problem are indistinguishable, it's no longer a problem. You dumb cunt.
>you shoukd be applying profiles I don't apply any profiles, i make my own for every shoot, lighting and lens. I'm on a completely different level to you. "neutral and landscape colour profiles" lmfao, I'm ded.
>muh japan sales figuresLmfao, just look at amazon best sellers for usa (read:relevant) figures.
>>3401560Sony is not only sharper, but faster too, these results can be seen from any of sonys gm range. Pic related. Sony have also proven time and time again, they have the best af, especially with eye af.
>>3401561I'd love to see that coffin get nailed like that
>>3401593They literally have the most advanced optics lab in the world
>>3401761>i think dxo is shitwell done on having the closest to a defendable argument against dxo I've seen, there's not much arguing to be done against an opinion. I'm glad you had the sense to not try to disparage the results.
