>>3361818I don't think it's overprocessed, his processing makes artistic sense.
>>3361822Not a fan of that one desu.
>>3361883What EXIF did he check? I posted
>>3361575,
>>3361580 and
>>3361584 and none of them have EXIF. Do you have some section in the site where the EXIF is shown? Because I didn't see it.
>>3361888>The EM10 doesn't even have an ISO 100 settingIt's called ISO Low.
>and the charts don't even go up to the EM10's maximum ISO of 25600Yes they do.
>base ISO 200The base ISO is 100 which is labeled "low" in the menus.
>>3361893I don't have the Oly to make an A-B test so the charts are the best I have.
>>3361895I will, after this post.
>>3361899How would you check the EXIF? The files I downloaded don't have it.
