>>37165201. No, image quality isn't only worse than FF, they are worse than other aps-c cameras. Look at the text in pic related.
2. No, Fuji lenses are ridiculously overpriced. The cheapest trinity of fast, autofocus 35, 50 and 85mm equivalents comes in at over $1000, more than twice as much as it costs on sony full frame.
>>3716504>Mirrorless lenses are biggerNo, they aren't.
The smallest and lightest normal pro zoom is on Sony, the smallest and lightest ultra wide and wide angle pro zooms are on Sony. And existing dslr lens designs work just fine on Sony. And the Nikon mount is 2mm shorter than Sony's, are they wrong too? And if Sony's mount is so hard, why is it the most popular mount for lens makers by a country mile?
