>>4349512The doghair guy is the one doing the 8x10 macros, and he's called doghair guy because when he first started posting a few months ago he was spamming this thread with 35mm and then 120 scans of literal garbage and seething enclosures of animals around his recently inherited farm. And all the photos looked the same and they were all terribly scanned and covered in dander due to the squalour he cohabits with his german shepherd life partner.
But every 5 minutes he keeps buying larger, more expensive gear, I guess in some part to end up with sharper test photos than anyone else, which means that he's now pretty much maxed out at 8x10 having gone through canon eos, hasselblad, 70mm, 4x5 and glass wet plates.
Thankfully this has slowed down his posting rate, but even with far fewer images he still refuses to create clean scans of his them, and insists that me having done so with a negligible investment of time, money and effort for more than a decade, and espousing this method to others, is evidence that I'm an obsessed autist.
