>>3857893No I legitimately look some images for a nighclub at 51200 (mostly at 100-400 with flash, but a few to get some atmospheric lights) and they’re usable. There’s no chance in hell i could have used a 6d photo at that iso. Not even close. I’m thinking that possibly smaller pixels might cause the noise to be less noticeable too? I’ll have to do a test one day. I’ve been meaning to but keep putting it off
Look at this image - clearly very noisy. But i’m ok with it. The 6d would 100% have been utter useless garbage at this point - i know, i’ve used it for 5 years in just this kind of scenario.
