>>4160180I have to hand it to Sony though, at least they tacitly admit their designs suck. Pic related
>>4160206Absolutely. It's how they bury their heads in the sand.
>>4160207Is there such a thing as definite proof that someone owns a camera at all? Do you think photography is intrinsically truthful? Are you not aware of the marvels of AI? Let me guess, you unironically believe JFK was shot dead by Lee Harvey Oswald the lone shooter. Fuck you and your inability to question whatever is presented to you in a non-tangible way (zeroes and ones aren't tangible). This is the age of AI, photos are worthless as proof of anything. You live in the matrix. Photos are now to be enjoyed as art, not to be utilized as some stand-in for actual proof. They were never proof of anything as one can see in all those doctored pictures of German soldiers made to look as if they committed all sorts of war crimes, but in the age of image synthesis the pretense of they being proof of anything can finally be dropped.
