>>3118157You're not a bad photog (room for improvement though, especially in post-processing)
but goddamn do these images drive home just how lacklustre I find digital imaging. It's all so ... sterile
>>3118175be proactive with how you approach freelancing. my mate got his first paid gig by asking the bartender at my university's bar if they ever had events that needed photographing, they did, she talked to the boss, then he talked to the boss, showed him some of his work and then went on to photograph a party at the bar later that evening
ask people/businesses before they start asking elsewhere. Chances are a wanted ad for freelance photogs will receive a lot of applications, and quite a lot of those applications will be better and more experienced thatnyours.
