>>2849125I've been accused of it often enough that I'm starting to think it could be true.
I know Rolleiflexes are supposed to be nice, but I have no experience with them and don't know anything about their durability.
If I did spring for a Rollei, which one to get though?
f/2.8 versions are much more expensive, and I'm not sure I'd need the extra speed of the lens over an f/3.5 version, but is the optics on the faster version much better throughout the aperture ranges?
Like I said, I have little to no clue about anything other than Flexarets.
