Alright you little shit nuggets, this is a jpg so I can't do much more, but tell me it's not better than
>>3339471She has a supposedly elegant dress, big jewelry, lots of makeup and it's a flat studio shot, you can't do messy like this, this is LAZY. L A Z Y.
>>3339555>don't listen to these clueless fag>posts photo of elegant model actually fitting with the theme with PERFECT HAIR in an indoor scene that is not a studioobviously you don't retouch hair IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO
>shouldn't bother with skinagain, no shit sherlock if your model has that skin no, you don't, but most models actually have body hair that shows only in photo, or not a perfect skin and not a perfect MUA so you have to.
>>3339744Yeah because that lazy portrait is going to make him grow soooo much, right? Not learning how to retouch is such a growing opportunity. I'm sure clients will go "oh wow how lazy is this, take my money".
