>>3739080What you're talking about is pure gibberish you picked from various web sites.
> Chances are your shitty monitor you got at a big box store doesn't have the color capabilities to show full coverage in Rec709 gamut, for example.Chances for that are extremely low to non existent. Rec709 is SRGB. They have identical colour range. Even cheap monitors come very close to that. Mid range monitor today will be 90% to 100% srgb. Thank you for proving again that you know nothing. When values go past that, you can see and analyse them for yourself with the tools you have available. Main drawback from working on srgb monitors in higher standards are that you can occasionally see banding where there is none. Argb monitors are advisable for editing photographs, since argb is becoming a standard for certain things. Video is still primarily output to lower colour ranges. TV, web, home cinema. with sole exception on hdr blue rays. So it really doesn't matter. Output must fit rec709. Rec709 is 100% srgb. That's all that is needed from editing monitor.
