>>3552696Also, that's the most highly compressed shot of all that I've posted so far. I had to do 5 out of 12 quality just to get it underneath 5MB because of all the detail.
So with it with like 45% jpeg quality, those rocks still look incredibly detailed. So frankly your criticisms are just wankery. Here's something like a 350% crop of the rocks.
Yeah. I think that's fine for a kit lens superzoom. Again, if you don't show me a kit lens superzoom on full frame at 16MP and tell me it's better.