>>3552300That there are steps up from mft besides MF which make sense.
>>3552302>"lens comparison"It's 61mp vs 20mp you idiot.
>>3552307>prime lenses perform differently when stopped downPic related. It's a $125 nifty-fifty vs a $1,400 Sigma ART. The difference between them wide open is huge. At f/5.6 it's nothing. Unless the 45 f/1.8 was a literal coke bottle piece of shit it would be able to match "muh expensive lens!" when both are stopped down.
Also: in my comparison I made sure to select the ISO 200 test shots for BOTH cameras. You've deceptively posted the ISO 100 Sony shot settings to make it look like DPReview did something nefarious. You're not just a brandtard, you're a lying piece of shit to.
