>>3197219>I’m pretty impressed they’ve managed to get it down to ONLY 3.5x.Yeah, that was a generous estimation of me.
In the real world, Canon sucks so much dicks and lacks so much technology that they can only fit 20 FF sensors into their wafers.
>80 / 20That's already 4 times as much cost. In best case scenario for Canon.
In reality, it's probably more like 5 to 6 times as costly.