>>3111340>There's no faceYou're right, but you're wrong. The face isn't important. It's what the face tells us that's important. In
>>3111338 he's covering his face, yet we can still tell the story behind it. Why? For all we know the photographer found him walking by and paid him a little to put his hand over his face and stand still.
What makes us see the full depth of his suffering?
For the record, you're not wrong. The human face is one of the most dynamic things in the universe, to humans at least. We can tell a great deal from them. But they're just a projection of that deep inner meaning.
Thank you, by the way. How about this one? I haven't done any post processing on it yet, so keep that in mind.