>>4099811Yes, pic related. Stay mad.
>>4099819>If you don't mind needing 4 times as much light and limiting your dof options you can spend 3 times as much on a lens that weighs 3 times as much and have worse quality with slower autofocus!Everyone should have a 70-200 f2.8, but saying it's a viable alternative to an 85mm is fucking retarded
>>4099825>If I had photo based employment and I wanted high quality photos, I would choose Sony, but I don't have employment of any sort, so I have poor kid hand-me-downsLol
