>>3727639Yes.
Arguably underexposed, even for a low-key shot. But the background is non-existent and the subject is split between definite highlights and almost indistinguishable shadows, so it is low-key.
The idiot saying low-key just means dark is probably trolling, but just in case someone takes le ebic ruse seriously, here is the shot from
>>3719356 with the original low-key shot on the left, and the non-low-key shot on the right with the exposure turned down and the contrast turned up. Not the same thing at all. It's like saying action photography (where there's fast-moving action frozen with a fast shutter) is just any photo with a fast shutter. Daytime landscape shot at 1/1000? Action shot.
