>>4382445Not sure why ultra-wide is your go-to argument, when nobody on this board has the social skills or creative merit to get within 5 meters of their subject.
Please good sir, post one of your works of art that relies on an ultra-wide angle and couldn't fathomably be replicated by simply steping backwards and using a wide angle.
>shouldn't be decent only for short telephoto onwardsLiterally the only thing it can't do with a kit lens is <24mm, and surprise fuckin surprise the RF 10-18mm is like $400. What are you, a poorfag?
Also, RF 24mm f/1.8 IS STM is optically as good and the same priceas the 35mm version, the 35mm is a stabilised 50mm equiv for only an extra $200, and the 50mm saves you like $400 over the RF 85mm IS f/2. If anything, everything kind of rounds itself out. All depends on **GASP** your use-case. How fuckin' dare people not exclusively be shooting ultra-wide amirite?
