>>2669592Well, they are lower resolution downloads from my flickr page to meet the board req's for <1000px/side. The scans I got from the lab are 3635px square. Grain...I see some on my underexposed images and when I'm looking at it 1:1 or closer, but it doesn't seem overly bad for what I was expecting out of 400 speed film.
Regardless, do you have a lab suggestion that does better work? When my negs come back this week I'm going to try a DSLR scan.
For comparison, same lab, same camera, Fuji 400H.
